Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah D Kozel's avatar

Thanks for this comment! I think the main lesson for me is that people develop many skills and strategies that are “effective” but don’t always align with the industry standard practice. So, who defines what the skills of value are and what quality looks like? In volunteer fire companies, it’s usually defined by tradition, which is typically how someone did it long ago. That bumps up against formal training, which may be “right” but not practical. The credit we get for skills we already have is probably best defined by how well we can apply them in the context of our working environment (which includes getting other people to accept them as valuable).

Rainbow Roxy's avatar

This piece really made me think about our 'retrospective trainning' and how much we learn without formal acknowledgment; what unrecognized skills do you think are crucial for success in other high-stakes fields, becauze your breakdown of firefighting dangers is incredibly insightful.

No posts

Ready for more?